1 | // Copyright 2005, Google Inc.
|
---|
2 | // All rights reserved.
|
---|
3 | //
|
---|
4 | // Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
|
---|
5 | // modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
|
---|
6 | // met:
|
---|
7 | //
|
---|
8 | // * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
|
---|
9 | // notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
|
---|
10 | // * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
|
---|
11 | // copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
|
---|
12 | // in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
|
---|
13 | // distribution.
|
---|
14 | // * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
|
---|
15 | // contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
|
---|
16 | // this software without specific prior written permission.
|
---|
17 | //
|
---|
18 | // THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
|
---|
19 | // "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
|
---|
20 | // LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
|
---|
21 | // A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
|
---|
22 | // OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
|
---|
23 | // SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
|
---|
24 | // LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
|
---|
25 | // DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
|
---|
26 | // THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
|
---|
27 | // (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
|
---|
28 | // OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
|
---|
29 | //
|
---|
30 | // The purpose of this file is to generate Google Test output under
|
---|
31 | // various conditions. The output will then be verified by
|
---|
32 | // gtest_output_test.py to ensure that Google Test generates the
|
---|
33 | // desired messages. Therefore, most tests in this file are MEANT TO
|
---|
34 | // FAIL.
|
---|
35 | //
|
---|
36 | // Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)
|
---|
37 |
|
---|
38 | #include "gtest/gtest-spi.h"
|
---|
39 | #include "gtest/gtest.h"
|
---|
40 |
|
---|
41 | // Indicates that this translation unit is part of Google Test's
|
---|
42 | // implementation. It must come before gtest-internal-inl.h is
|
---|
43 | // included, or there will be a compiler error. This trick is to
|
---|
44 | // prevent a user from accidentally including gtest-internal-inl.h in
|
---|
45 | // his code.
|
---|
46 | #define GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ 1
|
---|
47 | #include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h"
|
---|
48 | #undef GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_
|
---|
49 |
|
---|
50 | #include <stdlib.h>
|
---|
51 |
|
---|
52 | #if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
|
---|
53 | using testing::ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter;
|
---|
54 | using testing::TestPartResultArray;
|
---|
55 |
|
---|
56 | using testing::internal::Notification;
|
---|
57 | using testing::internal::ThreadWithParam;
|
---|
58 | #endif
|
---|
59 |
|
---|
60 | namespace posix = ::testing::internal::posix;
|
---|
61 | using testing::internal::scoped_ptr;
|
---|
62 |
|
---|
63 | // Tests catching fatal failures.
|
---|
64 |
|
---|
65 | // A subroutine used by the following test.
|
---|
66 | void TestEq1(int x) {
|
---|
67 | ASSERT_EQ(1, x);
|
---|
68 | }
|
---|
69 |
|
---|
70 | // This function calls a test subroutine, catches the fatal failure it
|
---|
71 | // generates, and then returns early.
|
---|
72 | void TryTestSubroutine() {
|
---|
73 | // Calls a subrountine that yields a fatal failure.
|
---|
74 | TestEq1(2);
|
---|
75 |
|
---|
76 | // Catches the fatal failure and aborts the test.
|
---|
77 | //
|
---|
78 | // The testing::Test:: prefix is necessary when calling
|
---|
79 | // HasFatalFailure() outside of a TEST, TEST_F, or test fixture.
|
---|
80 | if (testing::Test::HasFatalFailure()) return;
|
---|
81 |
|
---|
82 | // If we get here, something is wrong.
|
---|
83 | FAIL() << "This should never be reached.";
|
---|
84 | }
|
---|
85 |
|
---|
86 | TEST(PassingTest, PassingTest1) {
|
---|
87 | }
|
---|
88 |
|
---|
89 | TEST(PassingTest, PassingTest2) {
|
---|
90 | }
|
---|
91 |
|
---|
92 | // Tests that parameters of failing parameterized tests are printed in the
|
---|
93 | // failing test summary.
|
---|
94 | class FailingParamTest : public testing::TestWithParam<int> {};
|
---|
95 |
|
---|
96 | TEST_P(FailingParamTest, Fails) {
|
---|
97 | EXPECT_EQ(1, GetParam());
|
---|
98 | }
|
---|
99 |
|
---|
100 | // This generates a test which will fail. Google Test is expected to print
|
---|
101 | // its parameter when it outputs the list of all failed tests.
|
---|
102 | INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(PrintingFailingParams,
|
---|
103 | FailingParamTest,
|
---|
104 | testing::Values(2));
|
---|
105 |
|
---|
106 | static const char kGoldenString[] = "\"Line\0 1\"\nLine 2";
|
---|
107 |
|
---|
108 | TEST(NonfatalFailureTest, EscapesStringOperands) {
|
---|
109 | std::string actual = "actual \"string\"";
|
---|
110 | EXPECT_EQ(kGoldenString, actual);
|
---|
111 |
|
---|
112 | const char* golden = kGoldenString;
|
---|
113 | EXPECT_EQ(golden, actual);
|
---|
114 | }
|
---|
115 |
|
---|
116 | // Tests catching a fatal failure in a subroutine.
|
---|
117 | TEST(FatalFailureTest, FatalFailureInSubroutine) {
|
---|
118 | printf("(expecting a failure that x should be 1)\n");
|
---|
119 |
|
---|
120 | TryTestSubroutine();
|
---|
121 | }
|
---|
122 |
|
---|
123 | // Tests catching a fatal failure in a nested subroutine.
|
---|
124 | TEST(FatalFailureTest, FatalFailureInNestedSubroutine) {
|
---|
125 | printf("(expecting a failure that x should be 1)\n");
|
---|
126 |
|
---|
127 | // Calls a subrountine that yields a fatal failure.
|
---|
128 | TryTestSubroutine();
|
---|
129 |
|
---|
130 | // Catches the fatal failure and aborts the test.
|
---|
131 | //
|
---|
132 | // When calling HasFatalFailure() inside a TEST, TEST_F, or test
|
---|
133 | // fixture, the testing::Test:: prefix is not needed.
|
---|
134 | if (HasFatalFailure()) return;
|
---|
135 |
|
---|
136 | // If we get here, something is wrong.
|
---|
137 | FAIL() << "This should never be reached.";
|
---|
138 | }
|
---|
139 |
|
---|
140 | // Tests HasFatalFailure() after a failed EXPECT check.
|
---|
141 | TEST(FatalFailureTest, NonfatalFailureInSubroutine) {
|
---|
142 | printf("(expecting a failure on false)\n");
|
---|
143 | EXPECT_TRUE(false); // Generates a nonfatal failure
|
---|
144 | ASSERT_FALSE(HasFatalFailure()); // This should succeed.
|
---|
145 | }
|
---|
146 |
|
---|
147 | // Tests interleaving user logging and Google Test assertions.
|
---|
148 | TEST(LoggingTest, InterleavingLoggingAndAssertions) {
|
---|
149 | static const int a[4] = {
|
---|
150 | 3, 9, 2, 6
|
---|
151 | };
|
---|
152 |
|
---|
153 | printf("(expecting 2 failures on (3) >= (a[i]))\n");
|
---|
154 | for (int i = 0; i < static_cast<int>(sizeof(a)/sizeof(*a)); i++) {
|
---|
155 | printf("i == %d\n", i);
|
---|
156 | EXPECT_GE(3, a[i]);
|
---|
157 | }
|
---|
158 | }
|
---|
159 |
|
---|
160 | // Tests the SCOPED_TRACE macro.
|
---|
161 |
|
---|
162 | // A helper function for testing SCOPED_TRACE.
|
---|
163 | void SubWithoutTrace(int n) {
|
---|
164 | EXPECT_EQ(1, n);
|
---|
165 | ASSERT_EQ(2, n);
|
---|
166 | }
|
---|
167 |
|
---|
168 | // Another helper function for testing SCOPED_TRACE.
|
---|
169 | void SubWithTrace(int n) {
|
---|
170 | SCOPED_TRACE(testing::Message() << "n = " << n);
|
---|
171 |
|
---|
172 | SubWithoutTrace(n);
|
---|
173 | }
|
---|
174 |
|
---|
175 | // Tests that SCOPED_TRACE() obeys lexical scopes.
|
---|
176 | TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, ObeysScopes) {
|
---|
177 | printf("(expected to fail)\n");
|
---|
178 |
|
---|
179 | // There should be no trace before SCOPED_TRACE() is invoked.
|
---|
180 | ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and shouldn't have a trace.";
|
---|
181 |
|
---|
182 | {
|
---|
183 | SCOPED_TRACE("Expected trace");
|
---|
184 | // After SCOPED_TRACE(), a failure in the current scope should contain
|
---|
185 | // the trace.
|
---|
186 | ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should have a trace.";
|
---|
187 | }
|
---|
188 |
|
---|
189 | // Once the control leaves the scope of the SCOPED_TRACE(), there
|
---|
190 | // should be no trace again.
|
---|
191 | ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and shouldn't have a trace.";
|
---|
192 | }
|
---|
193 |
|
---|
194 | // Tests that SCOPED_TRACE works inside a loop.
|
---|
195 | TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksInLoop) {
|
---|
196 | printf("(expected to fail)\n");
|
---|
197 |
|
---|
198 | for (int i = 1; i <= 2; i++) {
|
---|
199 | SCOPED_TRACE(testing::Message() << "i = " << i);
|
---|
200 |
|
---|
201 | SubWithoutTrace(i);
|
---|
202 | }
|
---|
203 | }
|
---|
204 |
|
---|
205 | // Tests that SCOPED_TRACE works in a subroutine.
|
---|
206 | TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksInSubroutine) {
|
---|
207 | printf("(expected to fail)\n");
|
---|
208 |
|
---|
209 | SubWithTrace(1);
|
---|
210 | SubWithTrace(2);
|
---|
211 | }
|
---|
212 |
|
---|
213 | // Tests that SCOPED_TRACE can be nested.
|
---|
214 | TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, CanBeNested) {
|
---|
215 | printf("(expected to fail)\n");
|
---|
216 |
|
---|
217 | SCOPED_TRACE(""); // A trace without a message.
|
---|
218 |
|
---|
219 | SubWithTrace(2);
|
---|
220 | }
|
---|
221 |
|
---|
222 | // Tests that multiple SCOPED_TRACEs can be used in the same scope.
|
---|
223 | TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, CanBeRepeated) {
|
---|
224 | printf("(expected to fail)\n");
|
---|
225 |
|
---|
226 | SCOPED_TRACE("A");
|
---|
227 | ADD_FAILURE()
|
---|
228 | << "This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A.";
|
---|
229 |
|
---|
230 | SCOPED_TRACE("B");
|
---|
231 | ADD_FAILURE()
|
---|
232 | << "This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A and B.";
|
---|
233 |
|
---|
234 | {
|
---|
235 | SCOPED_TRACE("C");
|
---|
236 | ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should "
|
---|
237 | << "contain trace point A, B, and C.";
|
---|
238 | }
|
---|
239 |
|
---|
240 | SCOPED_TRACE("D");
|
---|
241 | ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should "
|
---|
242 | << "contain trace point A, B, and D.";
|
---|
243 | }
|
---|
244 |
|
---|
245 | #if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
|
---|
246 | // Tests that SCOPED_TRACE()s can be used concurrently from multiple
|
---|
247 | // threads. Namely, an assertion should be affected by
|
---|
248 | // SCOPED_TRACE()s in its own thread only.
|
---|
249 |
|
---|
250 | // Here's the sequence of actions that happen in the test:
|
---|
251 | //
|
---|
252 | // Thread A (main) | Thread B (spawned)
|
---|
253 | // ===============================|================================
|
---|
254 | // spawns thread B |
|
---|
255 | // -------------------------------+--------------------------------
|
---|
256 | // waits for n1 | SCOPED_TRACE("Trace B");
|
---|
257 | // | generates failure #1
|
---|
258 | // | notifies n1
|
---|
259 | // -------------------------------+--------------------------------
|
---|
260 | // SCOPED_TRACE("Trace A"); | waits for n2
|
---|
261 | // generates failure #2 |
|
---|
262 | // notifies n2 |
|
---|
263 | // -------------------------------|--------------------------------
|
---|
264 | // waits for n3 | generates failure #3
|
---|
265 | // | trace B dies
|
---|
266 | // | generates failure #4
|
---|
267 | // | notifies n3
|
---|
268 | // -------------------------------|--------------------------------
|
---|
269 | // generates failure #5 | finishes
|
---|
270 | // trace A dies |
|
---|
271 | // generates failure #6 |
|
---|
272 | // -------------------------------|--------------------------------
|
---|
273 | // waits for thread B to finish |
|
---|
274 |
|
---|
275 | struct CheckPoints {
|
---|
276 | Notification n1;
|
---|
277 | Notification n2;
|
---|
278 | Notification n3;
|
---|
279 | };
|
---|
280 |
|
---|
281 | static void ThreadWithScopedTrace(CheckPoints* check_points) {
|
---|
282 | {
|
---|
283 | SCOPED_TRACE("Trace B");
|
---|
284 | ADD_FAILURE()
|
---|
285 | << "Expected failure #1 (in thread B, only trace B alive).";
|
---|
286 | check_points->n1.Notify();
|
---|
287 | check_points->n2.WaitForNotification();
|
---|
288 |
|
---|
289 | ADD_FAILURE()
|
---|
290 | << "Expected failure #3 (in thread B, trace A & B both alive).";
|
---|
291 | } // Trace B dies here.
|
---|
292 | ADD_FAILURE()
|
---|
293 | << "Expected failure #4 (in thread B, only trace A alive).";
|
---|
294 | check_points->n3.Notify();
|
---|
295 | }
|
---|
296 |
|
---|
297 | TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksConcurrently) {
|
---|
298 | printf("(expecting 6 failures)\n");
|
---|
299 |
|
---|
300 | CheckPoints check_points;
|
---|
301 | ThreadWithParam<CheckPoints*> thread(&ThreadWithScopedTrace,
|
---|
302 | &check_points,
|
---|
303 | NULL);
|
---|
304 | check_points.n1.WaitForNotification();
|
---|
305 |
|
---|
306 | {
|
---|
307 | SCOPED_TRACE("Trace A");
|
---|
308 | ADD_FAILURE()
|
---|
309 | << "Expected failure #2 (in thread A, trace A & B both alive).";
|
---|
310 | check_points.n2.Notify();
|
---|
311 | check_points.n3.WaitForNotification();
|
---|
312 |
|
---|
313 | ADD_FAILURE()
|
---|
314 | << "Expected failure #5 (in thread A, only trace A alive).";
|
---|
315 | } // Trace A dies here.
|
---|
316 | ADD_FAILURE()
|
---|
317 | << "Expected failure #6 (in thread A, no trace alive).";
|
---|
318 | thread.Join();
|
---|
319 | }
|
---|
320 | #endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
|
---|
321 |
|
---|
322 | TEST(DisabledTestsWarningTest,
|
---|
323 | DISABLED_AlsoRunDisabledTestsFlagSuppressesWarning) {
|
---|
324 | // This test body is intentionally empty. Its sole purpose is for
|
---|
325 | // verifying that the --gtest_also_run_disabled_tests flag
|
---|
326 | // suppresses the "YOU HAVE 12 DISABLED TESTS" warning at the end of
|
---|
327 | // the test output.
|
---|
328 | }
|
---|
329 |
|
---|
330 | // Tests using assertions outside of TEST and TEST_F.
|
---|
331 | //
|
---|
332 | // This function creates two failures intentionally.
|
---|
333 | void AdHocTest() {
|
---|
334 | printf("The non-test part of the code is expected to have 2 failures.\n\n");
|
---|
335 | EXPECT_TRUE(false);
|
---|
336 | EXPECT_EQ(2, 3);
|
---|
337 | }
|
---|
338 |
|
---|
339 | // Runs all TESTs, all TEST_Fs, and the ad hoc test.
|
---|
340 | int RunAllTests() {
|
---|
341 | AdHocTest();
|
---|
342 | return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
|
---|
343 | }
|
---|
344 |
|
---|
345 | // Tests non-fatal failures in the fixture constructor.
|
---|
346 | class NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest : public testing::Test {
|
---|
347 | protected:
|
---|
348 | NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() {
|
---|
349 | printf("(expecting 5 failures)\n");
|
---|
350 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #1, in the test fixture c'tor.";
|
---|
351 | }
|
---|
352 |
|
---|
353 | ~NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() {
|
---|
354 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #5, in the test fixture d'tor.";
|
---|
355 | }
|
---|
356 |
|
---|
357 | virtual void SetUp() {
|
---|
358 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #2, in SetUp().";
|
---|
359 | }
|
---|
360 |
|
---|
361 | virtual void TearDown() {
|
---|
362 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #4, in TearDown.";
|
---|
363 | }
|
---|
364 | };
|
---|
365 |
|
---|
366 | TEST_F(NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest, FailureInConstructor) {
|
---|
367 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #3, in the test body.";
|
---|
368 | }
|
---|
369 |
|
---|
370 | // Tests fatal failures in the fixture constructor.
|
---|
371 | class FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest : public testing::Test {
|
---|
372 | protected:
|
---|
373 | FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() {
|
---|
374 | printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n");
|
---|
375 | Init();
|
---|
376 | }
|
---|
377 |
|
---|
378 | ~FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() {
|
---|
379 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #2, in the test fixture d'tor.";
|
---|
380 | }
|
---|
381 |
|
---|
382 | virtual void SetUp() {
|
---|
383 | ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in SetUp(). "
|
---|
384 | << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor "
|
---|
385 | << "had a fatal failure.";
|
---|
386 | }
|
---|
387 |
|
---|
388 | virtual void TearDown() {
|
---|
389 | ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in TearDown(). "
|
---|
390 | << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor "
|
---|
391 | << "had a fatal failure.";
|
---|
392 | }
|
---|
393 |
|
---|
394 | private:
|
---|
395 | void Init() {
|
---|
396 | FAIL() << "Expected failure #1, in the test fixture c'tor.";
|
---|
397 | }
|
---|
398 | };
|
---|
399 |
|
---|
400 | TEST_F(FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest, FailureInConstructor) {
|
---|
401 | ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in the test body. "
|
---|
402 | << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor "
|
---|
403 | << "had a fatal failure.";
|
---|
404 | }
|
---|
405 |
|
---|
406 | // Tests non-fatal failures in SetUp().
|
---|
407 | class NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest : public testing::Test {
|
---|
408 | protected:
|
---|
409 | virtual ~NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest() {
|
---|
410 | Deinit();
|
---|
411 | }
|
---|
412 |
|
---|
413 | virtual void SetUp() {
|
---|
414 | printf("(expecting 4 failures)\n");
|
---|
415 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #1, in SetUp().";
|
---|
416 | }
|
---|
417 |
|
---|
418 | virtual void TearDown() {
|
---|
419 | FAIL() << "Expected failure #3, in TearDown().";
|
---|
420 | }
|
---|
421 | private:
|
---|
422 | void Deinit() {
|
---|
423 | FAIL() << "Expected failure #4, in the test fixture d'tor.";
|
---|
424 | }
|
---|
425 | };
|
---|
426 |
|
---|
427 | TEST_F(NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest, FailureInSetUp) {
|
---|
428 | FAIL() << "Expected failure #2, in the test function.";
|
---|
429 | }
|
---|
430 |
|
---|
431 | // Tests fatal failures in SetUp().
|
---|
432 | class FatalFailureInSetUpTest : public testing::Test {
|
---|
433 | protected:
|
---|
434 | virtual ~FatalFailureInSetUpTest() {
|
---|
435 | Deinit();
|
---|
436 | }
|
---|
437 |
|
---|
438 | virtual void SetUp() {
|
---|
439 | printf("(expecting 3 failures)\n");
|
---|
440 | FAIL() << "Expected failure #1, in SetUp().";
|
---|
441 | }
|
---|
442 |
|
---|
443 | virtual void TearDown() {
|
---|
444 | FAIL() << "Expected failure #2, in TearDown().";
|
---|
445 | }
|
---|
446 | private:
|
---|
447 | void Deinit() {
|
---|
448 | FAIL() << "Expected failure #3, in the test fixture d'tor.";
|
---|
449 | }
|
---|
450 | };
|
---|
451 |
|
---|
452 | TEST_F(FatalFailureInSetUpTest, FailureInSetUp) {
|
---|
453 | FAIL() << "UNEXPECTED failure in the test function. "
|
---|
454 | << "We should never get here, as SetUp() failed.";
|
---|
455 | }
|
---|
456 |
|
---|
457 | TEST(AddFailureAtTest, MessageContainsSpecifiedFileAndLineNumber) {
|
---|
458 | ADD_FAILURE_AT("foo.cc", 42) << "Expected failure in foo.cc";
|
---|
459 | }
|
---|
460 |
|
---|
461 | #if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
|
---|
462 |
|
---|
463 | // A unary function that may die.
|
---|
464 | void DieIf(bool should_die) {
|
---|
465 | GTEST_CHECK_(!should_die) << " - death inside DieIf().";
|
---|
466 | }
|
---|
467 |
|
---|
468 | // Tests running death tests in a multi-threaded context.
|
---|
469 |
|
---|
470 | // Used for coordination between the main and the spawn thread.
|
---|
471 | struct SpawnThreadNotifications {
|
---|
472 | SpawnThreadNotifications() {}
|
---|
473 |
|
---|
474 | Notification spawn_thread_started;
|
---|
475 | Notification spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate;
|
---|
476 |
|
---|
477 | private:
|
---|
478 | GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(SpawnThreadNotifications);
|
---|
479 | };
|
---|
480 |
|
---|
481 | // The function to be executed in the thread spawn by the
|
---|
482 | // MultipleThreads test (below).
|
---|
483 | static void ThreadRoutine(SpawnThreadNotifications* notifications) {
|
---|
484 | // Signals the main thread that this thread has started.
|
---|
485 | notifications->spawn_thread_started.Notify();
|
---|
486 |
|
---|
487 | // Waits for permission to finish from the main thread.
|
---|
488 | notifications->spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate.WaitForNotification();
|
---|
489 | }
|
---|
490 |
|
---|
491 | // This is a death-test test, but it's not named with a DeathTest
|
---|
492 | // suffix. It starts threads which might interfere with later
|
---|
493 | // death tests, so it must run after all other death tests.
|
---|
494 | class DeathTestAndMultiThreadsTest : public testing::Test {
|
---|
495 | protected:
|
---|
496 | // Starts a thread and waits for it to begin.
|
---|
497 | virtual void SetUp() {
|
---|
498 | thread_.reset(new ThreadWithParam<SpawnThreadNotifications*>(
|
---|
499 | &ThreadRoutine, ¬ifications_, NULL));
|
---|
500 | notifications_.spawn_thread_started.WaitForNotification();
|
---|
501 | }
|
---|
502 | // Tells the thread to finish, and reaps it.
|
---|
503 | // Depending on the version of the thread library in use,
|
---|
504 | // a manager thread might still be left running that will interfere
|
---|
505 | // with later death tests. This is unfortunate, but this class
|
---|
506 | // cleans up after itself as best it can.
|
---|
507 | virtual void TearDown() {
|
---|
508 | notifications_.spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate.Notify();
|
---|
509 | }
|
---|
510 |
|
---|
511 | private:
|
---|
512 | SpawnThreadNotifications notifications_;
|
---|
513 | scoped_ptr<ThreadWithParam<SpawnThreadNotifications*> > thread_;
|
---|
514 | };
|
---|
515 |
|
---|
516 | #endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
|
---|
517 |
|
---|
518 | // The MixedUpTestCaseTest test case verifies that Google Test will fail a
|
---|
519 | // test if it uses a different fixture class than what other tests in
|
---|
520 | // the same test case use. It deliberately contains two fixture
|
---|
521 | // classes with the same name but defined in different namespaces.
|
---|
522 |
|
---|
523 | // The MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest test case verifies that
|
---|
524 | // when the user defines two tests with the same test case name AND
|
---|
525 | // same test name (but in different namespaces), the second test will
|
---|
526 | // fail.
|
---|
527 |
|
---|
528 | namespace foo {
|
---|
529 |
|
---|
530 | class MixedUpTestCaseTest : public testing::Test {
|
---|
531 | };
|
---|
532 |
|
---|
533 | TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, FirstTestFromNamespaceFoo) {}
|
---|
534 | TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, SecondTestFromNamespaceFoo) {}
|
---|
535 |
|
---|
536 | class MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest : public testing::Test {
|
---|
537 | };
|
---|
538 |
|
---|
539 | TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest,
|
---|
540 | TheSecondTestWithThisNameShouldFail) {}
|
---|
541 |
|
---|
542 | } // namespace foo
|
---|
543 |
|
---|
544 | namespace bar {
|
---|
545 |
|
---|
546 | class MixedUpTestCaseTest : public testing::Test {
|
---|
547 | };
|
---|
548 |
|
---|
549 | // The following two tests are expected to fail. We rely on the
|
---|
550 | // golden file to check that Google Test generates the right error message.
|
---|
551 | TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, ThisShouldFail) {}
|
---|
552 | TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, ThisShouldFailToo) {}
|
---|
553 |
|
---|
554 | class MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest : public testing::Test {
|
---|
555 | };
|
---|
556 |
|
---|
557 | // Expected to fail. We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test
|
---|
558 | // generates the right error message.
|
---|
559 | TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest,
|
---|
560 | TheSecondTestWithThisNameShouldFail) {}
|
---|
561 |
|
---|
562 | } // namespace bar
|
---|
563 |
|
---|
564 | // The following two test cases verify that Google Test catches the user
|
---|
565 | // error of mixing TEST and TEST_F in the same test case. The first
|
---|
566 | // test case checks the scenario where TEST_F appears before TEST, and
|
---|
567 | // the second one checks where TEST appears before TEST_F.
|
---|
568 |
|
---|
569 | class TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case : public testing::Test {
|
---|
570 | };
|
---|
571 |
|
---|
572 | TEST_F(TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST_F) {}
|
---|
573 |
|
---|
574 | // Expected to fail. We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test
|
---|
575 | // generates the right error message.
|
---|
576 | TEST(TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTESTAndShouldFail) {}
|
---|
577 |
|
---|
578 | class TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case : public testing::Test {
|
---|
579 | };
|
---|
580 |
|
---|
581 | TEST(TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST) {}
|
---|
582 |
|
---|
583 | // Expected to fail. We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test
|
---|
584 | // generates the right error message.
|
---|
585 | TEST_F(TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST_FAndShouldFail) {
|
---|
586 | }
|
---|
587 |
|
---|
588 | // Used for testing EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() and EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE().
|
---|
589 | int global_integer = 0;
|
---|
590 |
|
---|
591 | // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() can reference global variables.
|
---|
592 | TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, CanReferenceGlobalVariables) {
|
---|
593 | global_integer = 0;
|
---|
594 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
|
---|
595 | EXPECT_EQ(1, global_integer) << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
|
---|
596 | }, "Expected non-fatal failure.");
|
---|
597 | }
|
---|
598 |
|
---|
599 | // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() can reference local variables
|
---|
600 | // (static or not).
|
---|
601 | TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, CanReferenceLocalVariables) {
|
---|
602 | int m = 0;
|
---|
603 | static int n;
|
---|
604 | n = 1;
|
---|
605 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
|
---|
606 | EXPECT_EQ(m, n) << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
|
---|
607 | }, "Expected non-fatal failure.");
|
---|
608 | }
|
---|
609 |
|
---|
610 | // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() succeeds when there is exactly
|
---|
611 | // one non-fatal failure and no fatal failure.
|
---|
612 | TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, SucceedsWhenThereIsOneNonfatalFailure) {
|
---|
613 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
|
---|
614 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
|
---|
615 | }, "Expected non-fatal failure.");
|
---|
616 | }
|
---|
617 |
|
---|
618 | // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is no
|
---|
619 | // non-fatal failure.
|
---|
620 | TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsNoNonfatalFailure) {
|
---|
621 | printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
|
---|
622 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
|
---|
623 | }, "");
|
---|
624 | }
|
---|
625 |
|
---|
626 | // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there are two
|
---|
627 | // non-fatal failures.
|
---|
628 | TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereAreTwoNonfatalFailures) {
|
---|
629 | printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
|
---|
630 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
|
---|
631 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure 1.";
|
---|
632 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure 2.";
|
---|
633 | }, "");
|
---|
634 | }
|
---|
635 |
|
---|
636 | // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is one fatal
|
---|
637 | // failure.
|
---|
638 | TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsOneFatalFailure) {
|
---|
639 | printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
|
---|
640 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
|
---|
641 | FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
|
---|
642 | }, "");
|
---|
643 | }
|
---|
644 |
|
---|
645 | // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
|
---|
646 | // tested returns.
|
---|
647 | TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementReturns) {
|
---|
648 | printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
|
---|
649 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
|
---|
650 | return;
|
---|
651 | }, "");
|
---|
652 | }
|
---|
653 |
|
---|
654 | #if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
|
---|
655 |
|
---|
656 | // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
|
---|
657 | // tested throws.
|
---|
658 | TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementThrows) {
|
---|
659 | printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
|
---|
660 | try {
|
---|
661 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
|
---|
662 | throw 0;
|
---|
663 | }, "");
|
---|
664 | } catch(int) { // NOLINT
|
---|
665 | }
|
---|
666 | }
|
---|
667 |
|
---|
668 | #endif // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
|
---|
669 |
|
---|
670 | // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() can reference global variables.
|
---|
671 | TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, CanReferenceGlobalVariables) {
|
---|
672 | global_integer = 0;
|
---|
673 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
|
---|
674 | ASSERT_EQ(1, global_integer) << "Expected fatal failure.";
|
---|
675 | }, "Expected fatal failure.");
|
---|
676 | }
|
---|
677 |
|
---|
678 | // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() can reference local static
|
---|
679 | // variables.
|
---|
680 | TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, CanReferenceLocalStaticVariables) {
|
---|
681 | static int n;
|
---|
682 | n = 1;
|
---|
683 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
|
---|
684 | ASSERT_EQ(0, n) << "Expected fatal failure.";
|
---|
685 | }, "Expected fatal failure.");
|
---|
686 | }
|
---|
687 |
|
---|
688 | // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() succeeds when there is exactly
|
---|
689 | // one fatal failure and no non-fatal failure.
|
---|
690 | TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, SucceedsWhenThereIsOneFatalFailure) {
|
---|
691 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
|
---|
692 | FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
|
---|
693 | }, "Expected fatal failure.");
|
---|
694 | }
|
---|
695 |
|
---|
696 | // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is no fatal
|
---|
697 | // failure.
|
---|
698 | TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsNoFatalFailure) {
|
---|
699 | printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
|
---|
700 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
|
---|
701 | }, "");
|
---|
702 | }
|
---|
703 |
|
---|
704 | // A helper for generating a fatal failure.
|
---|
705 | void FatalFailure() {
|
---|
706 | FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
|
---|
707 | }
|
---|
708 |
|
---|
709 | // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there are two
|
---|
710 | // fatal failures.
|
---|
711 | TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereAreTwoFatalFailures) {
|
---|
712 | printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
|
---|
713 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
|
---|
714 | FatalFailure();
|
---|
715 | FatalFailure();
|
---|
716 | }, "");
|
---|
717 | }
|
---|
718 |
|
---|
719 | // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is one non-fatal
|
---|
720 | // failure.
|
---|
721 | TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsOneNonfatalFailure) {
|
---|
722 | printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
|
---|
723 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
|
---|
724 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
|
---|
725 | }, "");
|
---|
726 | }
|
---|
727 |
|
---|
728 | // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
|
---|
729 | // tested returns.
|
---|
730 | TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementReturns) {
|
---|
731 | printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
|
---|
732 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
|
---|
733 | return;
|
---|
734 | }, "");
|
---|
735 | }
|
---|
736 |
|
---|
737 | #if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
|
---|
738 |
|
---|
739 | // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
|
---|
740 | // tested throws.
|
---|
741 | TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementThrows) {
|
---|
742 | printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
|
---|
743 | try {
|
---|
744 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
|
---|
745 | throw 0;
|
---|
746 | }, "");
|
---|
747 | } catch(int) { // NOLINT
|
---|
748 | }
|
---|
749 | }
|
---|
750 |
|
---|
751 | #endif // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
|
---|
752 |
|
---|
753 | // This #ifdef block tests the output of typed tests.
|
---|
754 | #if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST
|
---|
755 |
|
---|
756 | template <typename T>
|
---|
757 | class TypedTest : public testing::Test {
|
---|
758 | };
|
---|
759 |
|
---|
760 | TYPED_TEST_CASE(TypedTest, testing::Types<int>);
|
---|
761 |
|
---|
762 | TYPED_TEST(TypedTest, Success) {
|
---|
763 | EXPECT_EQ(0, TypeParam());
|
---|
764 | }
|
---|
765 |
|
---|
766 | TYPED_TEST(TypedTest, Failure) {
|
---|
767 | EXPECT_EQ(1, TypeParam()) << "Expected failure";
|
---|
768 | }
|
---|
769 |
|
---|
770 | #endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST
|
---|
771 |
|
---|
772 | // This #ifdef block tests the output of type-parameterized tests.
|
---|
773 | #if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P
|
---|
774 |
|
---|
775 | template <typename T>
|
---|
776 | class TypedTestP : public testing::Test {
|
---|
777 | };
|
---|
778 |
|
---|
779 | TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(TypedTestP);
|
---|
780 |
|
---|
781 | TYPED_TEST_P(TypedTestP, Success) {
|
---|
782 | EXPECT_EQ(0U, TypeParam());
|
---|
783 | }
|
---|
784 |
|
---|
785 | TYPED_TEST_P(TypedTestP, Failure) {
|
---|
786 | EXPECT_EQ(1U, TypeParam()) << "Expected failure";
|
---|
787 | }
|
---|
788 |
|
---|
789 | REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(TypedTestP, Success, Failure);
|
---|
790 |
|
---|
791 | typedef testing::Types<unsigned char, unsigned int> UnsignedTypes;
|
---|
792 | INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(Unsigned, TypedTestP, UnsignedTypes);
|
---|
793 |
|
---|
794 | #endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P
|
---|
795 |
|
---|
796 | #if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
|
---|
797 |
|
---|
798 | // We rely on the golden file to verify that tests whose test case
|
---|
799 | // name ends with DeathTest are run first.
|
---|
800 |
|
---|
801 | TEST(ADeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) {
|
---|
802 | }
|
---|
803 |
|
---|
804 | # if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST
|
---|
805 |
|
---|
806 | // We rely on the golden file to verify that typed tests whose test
|
---|
807 | // case name ends with DeathTest are run first.
|
---|
808 |
|
---|
809 | template <typename T>
|
---|
810 | class ATypedDeathTest : public testing::Test {
|
---|
811 | };
|
---|
812 |
|
---|
813 | typedef testing::Types<int, double> NumericTypes;
|
---|
814 | TYPED_TEST_CASE(ATypedDeathTest, NumericTypes);
|
---|
815 |
|
---|
816 | TYPED_TEST(ATypedDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) {
|
---|
817 | }
|
---|
818 |
|
---|
819 | # endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST
|
---|
820 |
|
---|
821 | # if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P
|
---|
822 |
|
---|
823 |
|
---|
824 | // We rely on the golden file to verify that type-parameterized tests
|
---|
825 | // whose test case name ends with DeathTest are run first.
|
---|
826 |
|
---|
827 | template <typename T>
|
---|
828 | class ATypeParamDeathTest : public testing::Test {
|
---|
829 | };
|
---|
830 |
|
---|
831 | TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(ATypeParamDeathTest);
|
---|
832 |
|
---|
833 | TYPED_TEST_P(ATypeParamDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) {
|
---|
834 | }
|
---|
835 |
|
---|
836 | REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(ATypeParamDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst);
|
---|
837 |
|
---|
838 | INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(My, ATypeParamDeathTest, NumericTypes);
|
---|
839 |
|
---|
840 | # endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P
|
---|
841 |
|
---|
842 | #endif // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
|
---|
843 |
|
---|
844 | // Tests various failure conditions of
|
---|
845 | // EXPECT_{,NON}FATAL_FAILURE{,_ON_ALL_THREADS}.
|
---|
846 | class ExpectFailureTest : public testing::Test {
|
---|
847 | public: // Must be public and not protected due to a bug in g++ 3.4.2.
|
---|
848 | enum FailureMode {
|
---|
849 | FATAL_FAILURE,
|
---|
850 | NONFATAL_FAILURE
|
---|
851 | };
|
---|
852 | static void AddFailure(FailureMode failure) {
|
---|
853 | if (failure == FATAL_FAILURE) {
|
---|
854 | FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
|
---|
855 | } else {
|
---|
856 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
|
---|
857 | }
|
---|
858 | }
|
---|
859 | };
|
---|
860 |
|
---|
861 | TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectFatalFailure) {
|
---|
862 | // Expected fatal failure, but succeeds.
|
---|
863 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
---|
864 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(SUCCEED(), "Expected fatal failure.");
|
---|
865 | // Expected fatal failure, but got a non-fatal failure.
|
---|
866 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
---|
867 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), "Expected non-fatal "
|
---|
868 | "failure.");
|
---|
869 | // Wrong message.
|
---|
870 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
---|
871 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), "Some other fatal failure "
|
---|
872 | "expected.");
|
---|
873 | }
|
---|
874 |
|
---|
875 | TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectNonFatalFailure) {
|
---|
876 | // Expected non-fatal failure, but succeeds.
|
---|
877 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
---|
878 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(SUCCEED(), "Expected non-fatal failure.");
|
---|
879 | // Expected non-fatal failure, but got a fatal failure.
|
---|
880 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
---|
881 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), "Expected fatal failure.");
|
---|
882 | // Wrong message.
|
---|
883 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
---|
884 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), "Some other non-fatal "
|
---|
885 | "failure.");
|
---|
886 | }
|
---|
887 |
|
---|
888 | #if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
|
---|
889 |
|
---|
890 | class ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest : public ExpectFailureTest {
|
---|
891 | protected:
|
---|
892 | static void AddFailureInOtherThread(FailureMode failure) {
|
---|
893 | ThreadWithParam<FailureMode> thread(&AddFailure, failure, NULL);
|
---|
894 | thread.Join();
|
---|
895 | }
|
---|
896 | };
|
---|
897 |
|
---|
898 | TEST_F(ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest, ExpectFatalFailure) {
|
---|
899 | // We only intercept the current thread.
|
---|
900 | printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n");
|
---|
901 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailureInOtherThread(FATAL_FAILURE),
|
---|
902 | "Expected fatal failure.");
|
---|
903 | }
|
---|
904 |
|
---|
905 | TEST_F(ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest, ExpectNonFatalFailure) {
|
---|
906 | // We only intercept the current thread.
|
---|
907 | printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n");
|
---|
908 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailureInOtherThread(NONFATAL_FAILURE),
|
---|
909 | "Expected non-fatal failure.");
|
---|
910 | }
|
---|
911 |
|
---|
912 | typedef ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest;
|
---|
913 |
|
---|
914 | // Tests that the ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter only catches failures from
|
---|
915 | // the current thread if it is instantiated with INTERCEPT_ONLY_CURRENT_THREAD.
|
---|
916 | TEST_F(ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest, InterceptOnlyCurrentThread) {
|
---|
917 | printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n");
|
---|
918 | TestPartResultArray results;
|
---|
919 | {
|
---|
920 | ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter reporter(
|
---|
921 | ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter::INTERCEPT_ONLY_CURRENT_THREAD,
|
---|
922 | &results);
|
---|
923 | AddFailureInOtherThread(FATAL_FAILURE);
|
---|
924 | AddFailureInOtherThread(NONFATAL_FAILURE);
|
---|
925 | }
|
---|
926 | // The two failures should not have been intercepted.
|
---|
927 | EXPECT_EQ(0, results.size()) << "This shouldn't fail.";
|
---|
928 | }
|
---|
929 |
|
---|
930 | #endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
|
---|
931 |
|
---|
932 | TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectFatalFailureOnAllThreads) {
|
---|
933 | // Expected fatal failure, but succeeds.
|
---|
934 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
---|
935 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(SUCCEED(), "Expected fatal failure.");
|
---|
936 | // Expected fatal failure, but got a non-fatal failure.
|
---|
937 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
---|
938 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE),
|
---|
939 | "Expected non-fatal failure.");
|
---|
940 | // Wrong message.
|
---|
941 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
---|
942 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE),
|
---|
943 | "Some other fatal failure expected.");
|
---|
944 | }
|
---|
945 |
|
---|
946 | TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectNonFatalFailureOnAllThreads) {
|
---|
947 | // Expected non-fatal failure, but succeeds.
|
---|
948 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
---|
949 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(SUCCEED(), "Expected non-fatal "
|
---|
950 | "failure.");
|
---|
951 | // Expected non-fatal failure, but got a fatal failure.
|
---|
952 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
---|
953 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE),
|
---|
954 | "Expected fatal failure.");
|
---|
955 | // Wrong message.
|
---|
956 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
---|
957 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE),
|
---|
958 | "Some other non-fatal failure.");
|
---|
959 | }
|
---|
960 |
|
---|
961 |
|
---|
962 | // Two test environments for testing testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment().
|
---|
963 |
|
---|
964 | class FooEnvironment : public testing::Environment {
|
---|
965 | public:
|
---|
966 | virtual void SetUp() {
|
---|
967 | printf("%s", "FooEnvironment::SetUp() called.\n");
|
---|
968 | }
|
---|
969 |
|
---|
970 | virtual void TearDown() {
|
---|
971 | printf("%s", "FooEnvironment::TearDown() called.\n");
|
---|
972 | FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
|
---|
973 | }
|
---|
974 | };
|
---|
975 |
|
---|
976 | class BarEnvironment : public testing::Environment {
|
---|
977 | public:
|
---|
978 | virtual void SetUp() {
|
---|
979 | printf("%s", "BarEnvironment::SetUp() called.\n");
|
---|
980 | }
|
---|
981 |
|
---|
982 | virtual void TearDown() {
|
---|
983 | printf("%s", "BarEnvironment::TearDown() called.\n");
|
---|
984 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
|
---|
985 | }
|
---|
986 | };
|
---|
987 |
|
---|
988 | bool GTEST_FLAG(internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests) = false;
|
---|
989 |
|
---|
990 | // The main function.
|
---|
991 | //
|
---|
992 | // The idea is to use Google Test to run all the tests we have defined (some
|
---|
993 | // of them are intended to fail), and then compare the test results
|
---|
994 | // with the "golden" file.
|
---|
995 | int main(int argc, char **argv) {
|
---|
996 | testing::GTEST_FLAG(print_time) = false;
|
---|
997 |
|
---|
998 | // We just run the tests, knowing some of them are intended to fail.
|
---|
999 | // We will use a separate Python script to compare the output of
|
---|
1000 | // this program with the golden file.
|
---|
1001 |
|
---|
1002 | // It's hard to test InitGoogleTest() directly, as it has many
|
---|
1003 | // global side effects. The following line serves as a sanity test
|
---|
1004 | // for it.
|
---|
1005 | testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv);
|
---|
1006 | if (argc >= 2 &&
|
---|
1007 | (std::string(argv[1]) ==
|
---|
1008 | "--gtest_internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests"))
|
---|
1009 | GTEST_FLAG(internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests) = true;
|
---|
1010 |
|
---|
1011 | #if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
|
---|
1012 | if (testing::internal::GTEST_FLAG(internal_run_death_test) != "") {
|
---|
1013 | // Skip the usual output capturing if we're running as the child
|
---|
1014 | // process of an threadsafe-style death test.
|
---|
1015 | # if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
|
---|
1016 | posix::FReopen("nul:", "w", stdout);
|
---|
1017 | # else
|
---|
1018 | posix::FReopen("/dev/null", "w", stdout);
|
---|
1019 | # endif // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
|
---|
1020 | return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
|
---|
1021 | }
|
---|
1022 | #endif // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
|
---|
1023 |
|
---|
1024 | if (GTEST_FLAG(internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests))
|
---|
1025 | return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
|
---|
1026 |
|
---|
1027 | // Registers two global test environments.
|
---|
1028 | // The golden file verifies that they are set up in the order they
|
---|
1029 | // are registered, and torn down in the reverse order.
|
---|
1030 | testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new FooEnvironment);
|
---|
1031 | testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new BarEnvironment);
|
---|
1032 |
|
---|
1033 | return RunAllTests();
|
---|
1034 | }
|
---|